Have you ever thought about the difference between impressionism and classical realism? What makes each style unique?  I have often marveled at an artists ability to portray the truth as one would see it but also to catch the moment and see the spirit of the scene.  These two traits are the best of both worlds in which I have created a new line for myself. 

Ever since I released the "Palette Knife" series, it has slowly but surely caught the attention of a new audience for me.  I have successfully combined the light and color of the romantic realist and topped it off with the spontaneity and freshness of an abstract impressionist.  This was no simple task.  In order for this style to work, it had to include all the best elements of each style without seeming "Frankensteined" or put together from a disharmonious  association.  When everything comes together like a great plan, it becomes a thing of beauty, a work of art.
This painting is titled
"Wailea Blue" after Maui's beautiful Wailea coastline looking at West Maui Mountains.  The background was done in brush but the details were painted with palette knife.  I am not such a purist in that I don't believe you have to do the entire painting with a knife.  Just the part that matters, the details.  This makes for a really loose and fresh interpretation of what could really be a picture perfect place.
This Painting is called
"A Beautiful Day At The Bay". It was done from start to finish with brushes.  The overall effect is realistic because there are no hard or abrupt edges.  The clouds are soft, the water is realistic and the composition is poetic. 

There you have it.  Two different styles, same artist.  The big differences are the signatures between the two. If you look closely I also sign my knifework with a knife.  That makes the whole line stand apart from the traditional line.  I have also not changed my original signature for the traditional work I still do.  I am curious as to what kind of person likes each style......